Clues about how human hearts form hint at routes to cell-based therapies.
Heart disease kills more people than any other condition, yet cell therapies for it remain frustratingly elusive. On page 113 of this issue, Kenneth Chien of the Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston, and his colleagues report a finding that could move this treatment closer to reality: human ‘progenitor’ cells that generate various types of heart tissue as they develop. Chien’s work remains a long way from the clinic, however, and clinical trials of other cell types for heart ailments have yielded mixed results. “Even the most ardent advocates are calling the long-term benefit modest,” says Christine Mummery, a stem-cell researcher at Leiden University in the Netherlands. That leaves open the question of what cell types, if any, could turn stem-cell research into reality for patients with heart disease.
Chien’s team had previously identified, in mice, heart progenitor cells that expressed a transcription factor called Isl1 (A. Moretti et al. Cell 127, 1151–1165; 2006). Their latest paper finds that these cells also exist in humans. After identifying cell populations in human fetal tissue, the researchers produced them from human embryonic stem cells. They also showed that the cells were multipotent — they could generate more progenitors as well as the major heart cell types of heart-muscle, smoothmuscle and blood-vessel cells.
The work provides an explanation for how heart cells differentiate. Although the cells exist for just a couple of days in mice, they persist for weeks in human fetuses. This implies that cells do not immediately differentiate into the major types of heart tissue, but that the heart is built from a pool of multipotent cells that persists and differentiates as the heart grows. The findings suggest that an effective approach to cell therapy might be “to put heart progenitors in, because that’s the way the heart is built in the first place”, says Chien. Philippe Menasche, a cardiac surgeon at the Georges Pompidou European
Hospital in Paris, has some doubts. He calls the work “a very interesting basic research paper”, but says that “when you are identifying progenitors like this, the first question is, ‘is it possible to isolate these cells selectively and use them [to treat patients]’?” And that isn’t possible, he says, because the telltale Isl1 is a protein that turns genes on and off and so must lie deep within the nucleus of the cell. Most robust technologies to purify cells do so through proteins those are found on the cell surface.
At the moment, Chien has to use genetically engineered fluorescent tags to identify cells that produce Isl1. Wariness over using genetically engineered cells, plus the fact that his cells are not genetically matched to patients’, make them less suitable for clinical trials. But for now, he says, they could be used to help screen potential heart drugs, and to help model childhood congenital diseases in which the heart is malformed. Chien hopes that researchers will eventually identify a set of surface markers that can isolate his cells reliably without genetic engineering.
Raj Makkar, a cardiologist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California, adds that researchers should look at the effects of Isl1 on other cells, including damaged heart tissue in situ. Adding or activating Isl1 could make some of the cells being tested in clinical trials more effective, he suggests.
Current trials for heart-disease therapies use cells collected from bone-marrow, heart and skeletal-muscle biopsies (see ‘Selected heart cell-therapy trials’). Much of the focus has been on cells that are easy to collect — mainly bonemarrow cells taken from the patients who will ultimately receive them. These cells do not seem to be able to generate heart muscle cells, called cardiomyocytes, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t helpful, argues Menasche. “It doesn’t imply they don’t have any effect,” he says. Several large-scale trials are under way to determine whether bone-marrow cells might instead benefit patients through the ‘paracrine’ effect: secreting growth factors that encourage hearts to grow new blood vessels and thereby preserve existing heart tissue. So far, says Mummery, the results have been ambiguous: the cells seem to be safe, but are not particularly effective. But others think that the efficacy of the cells has not yet been tested properly. Cells delivered too soon after a heart attack are unlikely to survive, for example, and their effects in very sick patients might be masked if healthier patients are also included in a trial, says Makkar.
Approaches using skeletal-muscle cells have also been mixed. In 2002, Menasche led a large clinical trial studying whether injecting skeletal muscle into the heart could restore heart function. In 2006 that trial was stopped early because of a lack of efficacy, and Menasche has since decided to work on cells derived from embryonic stem cells. These readily generate beating cardiomyocytes in laboratory dishes, but are difficult to integrate productively into damaged heart tissues. Problems include purifying cells, getting enough of them, making sure they are not attacked by the immune system and controlling for the possibility of unwanted growth — to say nothing of making sure that the introduced cells beat in time with the motion of the failing heart. Most bone-marrow trials focus on blood-forming stem cells, but another cell type found in bone marrow, called mesenchymal stem cells, is also being studied. Joshua Hare, of the University of Miami in Florida, says his team will soon report results from a phase II trial of mesenchymal stem cells, run by Osiris Therapeutics of Columbia, Maryland, showing that the cells both engraft as new cardiomyocytes and help through the paracrine effect. Indeed, Hare believes that doctors might eventually use a variety of cell therapies to treat heart disease. Mesenchymal stem cells could be used as a first-generation therapy, followed perhaps by cells derived from cardiac biopsies, followed by other cell types that have not yet entered clinical trials. He predicts that cardiac cell therapy will follow the same path as antibiotics. “Just because we have third-generation cephalosporins now,” he says, “doesn’t mean that penicillin didn’t work.”
Source of Information : Nature 02 July 2009